
In a judgment with wide-ranging consequences for mixed-nationality families, the Kerala High Court on 1 October 2026 dismissed a petition filed by an Indian citizen and his Pakistani wife seeking a short-stay tourist visa for the wife to attend a family wedding in Thiruvananthapuram. The bench held that “no foreign national can claim, as a matter of right, permission to enter or remain in India except in accordance with law,” relying on Section 3 of the Foreigners Act 1946 and precedent from the Supreme Court. Government counsel argued that issuance of visas to Pakistani nationals continues to be governed by a 2021 Home Ministry order that keeps the Pakistan visa channel “under suspension” except for medical emergencies and a handful of other categories. The judges agreed, noting that India’s bilateral visa protocol with Pakistan was “not reciprocal” and that security concerns justified tighter scrutiny. While the facts involve a Pakistani applicant, lawyers say the ruling underlines a broader principle: even where a foreigner is married to an Indian citizen, marriage alone does not create a fundamental right to an Indian visa. Immigration authorities may still refuse or delay entry if national security or public interest so requires. That reading could affect thousands of cross-border couples, particularly in the sub-continent, who currently rely on short-term tourist or X-miscellaneous visas while their long-term applications are processed. Corporate mobility managers should note that the court’s reasoning could also be invoked in business-visa contexts. Companies that routinely invite foreign spouses or partners on short notice may need to build in longer lead times and contingency plans—especially when dealing with nationals from countries on India’s higher-risk list. Immigration advisers recommend documenting the bona fides of the relationship and the purpose of visit, and exploring alternate visa categories such as the recently digitised e-Entry X-Visa where available. The decision adds yet another layer of complexity to India’s already fragmented family-reunification framework, under which OCI status is unavailable to spouses of Indian citizens unless they have been married for at least two years and the Indian partner undertakes an extensive security verification. Practitioners expect fresh litigation and calls for legislative clarity, but for now the message is clear: the sovereign right to refuse entry trumps familial equity.
Source: Hindustan Times